Skip to content

Strategic overcommitment: when going all-in can build your career base

Read aloud with highlighting. Audio loads only when you press play.

On this page8 sections

My personal take on when it can be worth going all-in for a while as an engineer, how to tell real creative momentum from pressure, and how to keep the push from tipping into burnout.

Most career advice about effort points one way: slow down, protect your evenings, don't let work eat your life. I agree with nearly all of it. Burnout is real, it's common in our industry, and nobody gets a prize for running themselves into the ground.

But I also think there's a quieter truth that doesn't get said much. Every so often, if you're lucky, you hit a stretch where you're genuinely fired up: a problem you can't stop thinking about, a skill that's finally clicking, a project that feels like yours. In those moments, I think it can be worth leaning in harder than usual, on purpose, for a limited time.

This is my personal opinion, not a prescription. It's what has worked for me, and the "on purpose" and "limited time" parts are doing a lot of work.

A caveat before anything else

If you're already tired, anxious, or dreading the work, this post isn't for right now. The World Health Organization describes burnout as a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress that hasn't been successfully managed, marked by exhaustion, growing mental distance or cynicism about your job, and reduced effectiveness. If that sounds familiar, the right move is usually less, not more, and talking to someone you trust or a health professional is a sign of good judgement, not weakness.

Everything below assumes you're starting from a healthy place and the energy is real.

Why I think a deliberate push can be worth it

Some things compound. If you spend a focused few months going deep on a new language, a hard problem or a side project, you often come out with:

  • A skill base you keep drawing on for years.
  • A body of work you can point to: a project, a portfolio, some writing, a talk.
  • Confidence that you can learn hard things quickly, which changes how you approach the next one.

Those things are much harder to build in scattered half-hours. Momentum matters. When you're in it, an extra evening can do more than a week of distracted effort later on.

And it's a privilege. Being in a situation, with the health, time and circumstances, where something lights you up like that isn't a given. When it happens, I think it's worth making the most of it.

Momentum or pressure? Telling them apart

This is the most important part, because the two can feel similar from the inside.

Real creative momentum usually looks like:

  • you want to come back to it, even after a break;
  • time passes quickly and you finish tired but satisfied;
  • you're curious, not just anxious about falling behind;
  • you'd keep going even if nobody was watching.

Pressure or guilt usually looks like:

  • you're pushing because you feel you should, or you're scared of what happens if you don't;
  • the work feels heavy before you start;
  • you feel worse after each session, not better;
  • it's driven mostly by someone else's expectations.

If it's the second list, overcommitting won't build a base. It'll just drain you.

How I'd structure a push

Time-box it

Decide up front how long the push lasts: a few weeks, a quarter, until a specific milestone. An end date turns "I'm always on" into "I'm doing a sprint". Put it in your calendar.

Decide what base you're building

Write down, in one or two sentences, what you want to have at the end. "I can build and deploy a small service in a new language." "A portfolio site with three real case studies." "A working prototype of the idea I keep sketching." If you can't name it, you're likely just working more, not building something.

Protect the non-negotiables

The things that keep you functioning aren't optional extras during a push. They're what make it possible:

  • Sleep. This is the first thing to go and the last thing you should trade.
  • Movement and food. Boring, essential.
  • People. Tell the people close to you what you're doing and for how long. Keep the time with them that matters most.

Keep a light log

A few lines at the end of each session: what you did, how you felt. It's a progress record and an early-warning system at the same time.

Warning signs it's tipping over

Watch for these, and take them seriously:

  • you're sleeping badly or relying on caffeine just to start;
  • the work you were excited about starts to feel like a chore;
  • you're snapping at people, or withdrawing from them;
  • you've stopped doing the things that recharge you;
  • you're extending the time box again and again.

When you notice them, step back. Take a few days off completely. Cut the scope. End the push early. Stopping isn't failing; it's the "managed" part of strategic overcommitment. If the signs don't lift with rest, talk to a doctor or another professional.

For me, the clearest version of "you've stopped doing the things that recharge you" is golf. When I catch myself thinking "I can't go this week, I've got too much to do", I've learned to treat that thought as a signal, not a fact. If I look back and realise I haven't played in a few weeks, that settles it: I make the time and go, on purpose. A round takes about four hours, and for those four hours I do my best to switch off from work completely. The work is still there when I get back, and I'm usually in better shape to deal with it.

Sometimes the most useful thing I can do with a busy week is step off the loop and go play a round.

When you're stuck, do something completely different

During a push it's tempting to treat being stuck as a reason to grind harder. In my experience that often makes it worse. When I've been going around in circles on a problem, what works surprisingly often is to stop and do something completely different. Then, later, on a walk, in the shower or halfway through a round of golf, the answer shows up out of nowhere.

This has a name: the incubation effect. Graham Wallas described it back in 1926 in The Art of Thought, where he split the creative process into four stages: preparation, incubation, illumination and verification. Preparation is the hard, conscious work on the problem. Incubation is the time when you're not consciously thinking about it at all. Illumination is the "happy idea" arriving, and verification is checking that it actually works.

It isn't just folklore. A 2009 meta-analysis by Sio and Ormerod pooled 117 studies and found a real, positive incubation effect. The effect was bigger when people had spent longer working on the problem first, and smaller when they filled the break with another demanding task. A 2012 study by Baird and colleagues found something similar: people who spent a break on an easy, undemanding task, the kind that lets your mind wander, did noticeably better when they came back to a creative problem they'd already seen. People who rested, did a demanding task or took no break didn't get that boost.

Wallas's four stages of creative thinking (1926): preparation, incubation, illumination and verification. The answer often turns up after you stop pushing.

What I take from that:

  • Do the preparation first. Incubation isn't a shortcut. It works on a problem you've already loaded into your head.
  • Pick something light. A walk, the dishes, a round of golf. Swapping one hard problem for another isn't a break.
  • Actually let go. It only works if you stop working the problem on purpose.
  • Then verify. The idea that shows up out of nowhere still has to be checked like any other.

Calm a racing brain

Meditation helps me with the other kind of stuck: when my brain is racing. When I'm jumping between the problem, the deadline and everything else on the list, I'm at my worst at solving anything. Taking a few minutes to meditate and let that settle is often what lets me see the problem clearly again.

There's some evidence for both halves of that. A 2014 meta-analysis in JAMA Internal Medicine by Goyal and colleagues looked at 47 randomised trials and found moderate evidence that mindfulness meditation programs reduce anxiety, and low-strength evidence that they reduce stress. And in a 2012 study by Ostafin and Kassman, people given brief mindfulness training did better on insight problems, the kind where you have to drop your first framing of the problem to see the answer, though not on ordinary step-by-step problems.

These are modest effects, and meditation isn't a treatment for burnout. But as a way to get my head out of a loop, I've found it really useful.

Coming down deliberately

The end of a push deserves as much intention as the start.

  • Actually stop. Take real rest afterwards, without guilt. Recovery is part of the plan.
  • Take stock. What did you build? What did you learn? Write it down while it's fresh.
  • Package it. Turn the work into something durable: a write-up, a repo with a good README, a short demo.
  • Reflect honestly. Was it worth it? What would you do differently? This tells you whether, and how, to do it again.

Wrapping up

I don't think anyone should live in permanent overdrive. But I do think that when real, creative momentum shows up, it can be worth leaning in for a while, as long as you set an end date, know what you're building, protect your sleep, health and relationships, and stop the moment it starts to cost more than it gives.

Used carefully, a push like that can lay down a base you build on for years. Used carelessly, it's just burnout with better branding. The difference is whether you're managing it, or it's managing you.